8g. Memo - Terminal 91 Domestic Waterline
COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM Item No. 8g ACTION ITEM Date of Meeting October 26, 2021 DATE: September 24, 2021 TO: Stephen P. Metruck, Executive Director FROM: John Hall, Project Manager III, Waterfront Project Management Kelli Goodwin, Sr. Manager Maritime Operations SUBJECT: Design Funding Authorization, T91 Piers Domestic Underdock Water Line (C801243) Amount of this request: $150,000 Total estimated project cost: $850,000 ACTION REQUESTED Request Commission authorization for the Executive Director to authorize $150,000 in design funding for the replacement of domestic underdock water lines at Pier 90 and Pier 91. This request would increase the total project authorization to date to $250,000 out of a total estimated project cost of $850,000. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Condition assessments completed recently recommend replacing approximately 3,000 linear feet of water line and the associated branch lines at Pier 90 and Pier 91. JUSTIFICATION This proposed body of work is needed to meet the Port's goal of asset preservation. These assets support the cruise industry and the North Pacific fishing fleet, as well as a warehouse and a cold storage building, located on Pier 90. Diversity in Contracting The design for the project will be completed by Port staff. Staff has contacted the Diversity in Contracting team and will coordinate with that team to identify opportunities for WMBE firms on any contracts supporting this project. DETAILS Condition reports completed recently show the pipes with visible deterioration and indicate a considerable portion of the water lines are due for replacement at Pier 90 and Pier 91. Template revised January 10, 2019. COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 8g Page 2 of 4 Meeting Date: October 26, 2021 Stakeholders for this project are Maritime Operations, Cruise Operations and Portfolio Management. Scope of Work The scope of work includes removing and replacing approximately 3,000-linear feet of under dock domestic water lines located at Pier 91 and Pier 90. The physical work will need to be completed in phases in consideration of operations and limitations imposed by seasonal weather. Schedule Due to operational constraints and an adjacent project, the construction will be completed in phases. Since the crews will be working from boats, work can only take place when the weather permits. Activity Commission design authorization 2021Q4 Design start 2021Q4 Commission construction authorization 2022Q2 Construction start 2022Q3 In-use date 2023Q4 Cost Breakdown This Request Total Project Design $150,000 $250,000 Construction $0 $600,000 Total $150,000 $850,000 ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS CONSIDERED Alternative 1 Defer the proposed scope of work for this project. Instead respond to failures as they occur. This describes current Marine Maintenance approach. Cost Implications: Costs for this option would be charged to the expense budget for the subclasses and could result in a negative budget variance. Pros: (1) Defers investment of $850,000 in the capital budget and retains Port capital for other priority projects and financial initiatives Cons: (1) Increases risk to the continuity of operations, including fishing vessel operations, cruise operations, and cold storage in the event of failure of the water lines. (2) Reduces capacity for other critical maintenance work. (3) Increases total cost of ownership due to increasing cost to maintain a failing system. This is not the recommended alternative. Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 8g Page 3 of 4 Meeting Date: October 26, 2021 Alternative 2 Complete the design work as planned, followed in close succession by the construction work. Cost Implications: The current total project value is estimated at $850,000. Construction costs are spread over two years in the projected cash flows to account for the phasing. Pros: (1) Addresses risk to continuity of operations including fishing vessel operations, cruise operations, and cold storage. (2) Takes a proactive step in preserving a critical port asset decreasing risk of operational disruptions due to emergency repairs. Cons: (1) This project will expend $850,000 from the capital budget. This is the recommended alternative. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS Cost Estimate/Authorization Summary Capital Expense Total COST ESTIMATE Original estimate $850,000 $0 $850,000 AUTHORIZATION Previous authorizations $100,000 0 $100,000 Current request for authorization $150,000 0 $150,000 Total authorizations, including this request $250,000 0 $250,000 Remaining amount to be authorized $600,000 $0 $600,000 Annual Budget Status and Source of Funds This project was included in the 2021 Capital Plan under C801152 MD Small Projects and has been included in the draft 2022 Capital Plan under C801243 T91 Piers Domestic Water Line with a total project cost of $850,000. This project will be funded by the General Fund. Financial Analysis and Summary Project cost for analysis $850,000 Business Unit (BU) Maritime Operations, Cruise Operations, and Portfolio Management Effect on business performance Increase annual depreciation by approx. $28K based on (NOI after depreciation) an expected 30-year life. IRR/NPV (if relevant) NA CPE Impact none Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting). COMMISSION AGENDA Action Item No. 8g Page 4 of 4 Meeting Date: October 26, 2021 Future Revenues and Expenses (Total cost of ownership) Cost to maintain the new assets will be included in the maintenance budget for the facility. No new or increased revenue is anticipated. ATTACHMENTS TO THIS REQUEST (1) Presentation slides PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTIONS OR BRIEFINGS None Template revised June 27, 2019 (Diversity in Contracting).
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.