7. Presentation
Emergency Procurement Presentation
INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT Operational Audit Emergency Procurement Audit March 2020 – March 2022 Issue Date: June 06, 2022 Report No. 2022-08 Emergency Procurement Audit TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................... 3 Background .................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Audit Scope and Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendix A: Risk Ratings ............................................................................................................................................. 7 Appendix B: Port of Seattle Memorandum ................................................................................................................. 8 2 Emergency Procurement Audit Executive Summary Internal Audit (IA) completed an audit of emergency procurements in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of the audit was to broadly evaluate internal controls, including whether purchases were made within the delegation of authority framework, whether state procurement laws were followed, and whether the costs of purchases were reasonable given the circumstances. The audit covered the period from March 1, 2020, through March 31, 2022. Procedures related to emergency COVID-19 construction costs are performed through the Capital Internal Audit function and were not included within the scope of this audit. As of May 3, 2022, approximately $8.75 million was authorized for COVID-19 mitigation costs on major construction projects (see background section for additional information). On March 16, 2020, the Port of Seattle’s (Port’s) Executive Director (ED) formally declared an emergency due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The intent of the declaration was to “minimize the impact of COVID-19 to Port of Seattle operations, its employees, contractors, and public health”, by providing authorization from the ED to expedite the “award of any necessary contracts including those for goods and services, personal services, professional services, and public works in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies…”. Emergency purchase provisions are guided by the Revised Code of Washington (RCW). RCW 39.04.280 defines an emergency as “unforeseen circumstances beyond the control of the municipality.” This RCW and other related RCWs broadly waive competitive bidding requirements to expediate the procurement process. In addition to RCW provisions, the Port’s procurement card policy (CPO-7) allows for routine purchases of goods and services up to $25,000 for Central Procurement Office (CPO) employees and $5,000 for other Port employees, and can be increased, when authorized in writing, to respond to an emergency. Finally, Attachment A of the Port’s Delegation of Authority Schedule (EX-2), includes emergency spending limits based on role. Collectively, these requirements shaped procurement practices during the COVID-19 emergency. We concluded that purchases were made within the Port’s delegation limits and followed RCW requirements. We also validated that those costs appeared reasonable while acknowledging that the primary objective of management was to acquire emergency supplies and services quickly. We extend our appreciation to management and staff of the Central Procurement Office for their assistance and cooperation during the audit. Glenn Fernandes, CPA Director, Internal Audit Responsible Management Team Nora Huey, Director, Central Procurement Office Dave Soike, Chief Operating Officer 3 Emergency Procurement Audit Background On March 16, 2020, the Port’s Executive Director (ED) formally declared an emergency due to the COVID- 19 outbreak. The intent of the declaration was to “minimize the impact of COVID-19 to Port of Seattle operations, its employees, contractors, and public health” by providing authorization from the ED to expedite the “award of any necessary contracts including those for goods and services, personal services, professional services, and public works in accordance with all applicable laws, regulations, and policies…” (See Appendix B for the Declaration of Emergency Memorandum). The table below reflects the annual costs and type of purchase for the period beginning March 16, 2020 and ending March 31, 2022. Cleaning Period Service1 Masks Sanitizer Supplies2 Total 2020 (March 16 - December 31) $ 915,378 $ 239,323 $ 274,488 $ 1,178,337 $ 2,607,526 2021 1,519,083 0 180,146 144,010 1,843,239 2022 (January 1 - March 31) 0 0 0 10,699 10,699 Total $ 2,434,461 $ 239,323 $ 454,634 $ 1,333,046 $ 4,461,464 The Port also reimburses Prime contractors for COVID-19 expense incurred on capital projects. The amount of reimbursement depends on the type of expense. For example, hand washing stations and hand tools are reimbursed at 50%, while the actual cost of a full-time COVID-19 site supervisor, plus the applicable markup is fully reimbursed. As discussed, these costs were not included within the scope of this audit, as they are audited through the Capital Internal Audit function. The table below reflects COVID-19 capital costs, as of May 3, 2022. Settlement of Direct COVID-19 other COVID-19 Division safety costs related costs Total Aviation $ 7,348,378 $ 1,112,371 $ 8,460,749 Maritime 183,364 98,170 281,534 Economic Development 12,653 0 12,653 Total $ 7,544,395 $ 1,210,541 $ 8,754,936 Attachment A, of the Port’s Delegation of Authority Schedule (EX-2), includes emergency spending limits based on role. Additionally, the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) allows for exceptions to standard procurement laws during an emergency. RCW 39.04.280 Competitive Bidding Requirements – Exemptions defines emergency as “unforseen circumstances beyond the control of the municipality that either: a) Present a real, immediate threat to the proper performance of essential functions; or b) Will likely result in material loss or damage to property, bodily injury, or loss of life, if immediate action is not taken.” According to the RCW, “If an emergency situation exists, the person or persons designated by the governing body of the municipality to act in the event of an emergency may declare an emergency situation 1 Includes enhanced cleaning and sanitation for TSA checkpoints and baggage screening requested by TSA valued at $2,149,017. 2 Includes installation of screening camera, cruise industry consulting services related to COVID-19, installation of UV sterilization device, and customer service support for elevated body temperature screening. 4 Emergency Procurement Audit exists, waive competitive bidding requirements, and award all necessary contracts on behalf of the municipaltiy to address the emergency situation.” State procurement and contracting laws promote open competition and transparency for goods and services, unless specifically exempted due to an emergency. Listed below are three emergency procurement provisions: RCW 39.04.280 Competitive Bidding Requirements Waives the competitive bidding requirements of public works contracts in the event of an emergency. RCW 39.80.060 Architectural and Engineering Services Permits an agency an exemption from following regularly required contract negotiation requirements for architectural and engineering services at a fair and reasonable price. RCW 53.19.020 Personal Service Contracts Gives an agency an exemption from competitive solicitation when an emergency exists. 5 Emergency Procurement Audit Audit Scope and Methodology We conducted the engagement in accordance with Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards and the International Standards for the Professional Practice of Internal Auditing. Those standards require that we plan and conduct an engagement to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our engagement objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our engagement objectives. In some cases, we used a judgmental method to determine the samples selected for our audit test work. In those cases, the results of the work cannot be projected to the population as a whole, as we did not select a statistical sample. The period audited was March 2020 through March 2022, and included the following procedures: Evaluation of Internal Controls • Reviewed policy and procedural documentation, most notably, the Port of Seattle’s Delegation of Authority Schedules (EX-2). • Validated that the ED declared an emergency and provided his consent to expedite procurement of contracts (good and services, personal services, professional services, and public works) to mitigate the impact of COVID-19. • Obtained an understanding of emergency RCW statutes, including 39.04.280 (Competitive Bidding), 39.26.130 (Emergency Purchases), 39.80.060 (Architectural and Engineering Services), and 53.19.020 (Personal Services Contracts). • Validated through discussions with management and review of documentation that requirements were adhered to. Substantive Procurement Testing • Selected a sample of procurements and validated that the emergency purchase was made by an individual who had proper authority (within limits contained in the EX-2 schedules). • Analyzed emergency procurements between March 2020 and March 2022. These purchases were coded to program code 8100, using either a purchase order or procurement card. • Discussed with management how and if they determined whether purchases were reasonable, prior to procurement. • Assessed the reasonableness of the amount paid for emergency goods and services by comparing the amount paid to third party sources. The audit did not include COVID-19 construction change orders for job site safety. Procedures related to construction costs, including COVID-19, are performed through the Capital Internal Audit function. 6 Emergency Procurement Audit Appendix A: Risk Ratings Findings identified during the audit are assigned a risk rating, as outlined in the table below. Only one of the criteria needs to be met for a finding to be rated High, Medium, or Low. Findings rated Low will be evaluated and may or may not be reflected in the final report. Financial Internal Commission/ Rating Compliance Public Stewardship Controls Management High probability Missing or not Non-compliance for external audit Requires with Laws, Port High Significant followed issues and / or immediate Policies, negative public attention Contracts perception Partial controls Partial Potential for compliance with external audit Requires Medium Moderate Laws, Port issues and / or attention Not functioning Policies negative public effectively Contracts perception Functioning as Low probability intended but Mostly complies Does not for external audit could be with Laws, Port require Low Minimal issues and/or enhanced to Policies, immediate negative public improve Contracts attention perception efficiency 7 Emergency Procurement Audit Appendix B: Port of Seattle Memorandum 8
Limitations of Translatable Documents
PDF files are created with text and images are placed at an exact position on a page of a fixed size.
Web pages are fluid in nature, and the exact positioning of PDF text creates presentation problems.
PDFs that are full page graphics, or scanned pages are generally unable to be made accessible, In these cases, viewing whatever plain text could be extracted is the only alternative.